The prompt is a specification
It must be written precisely enough to cover exactly what is required. A vague prompt produces a vague deliverable — and costs more to correct than to redo.
We use it daily, and we know precisely what we use it for. Here is what works, what failed, and the order in which it must be approached.
On a five-level data maturity scale, AI sits at level 4. Most organisations we meet are at level 1 or 2. Deploying AI on ungoverned data does not produce intelligence: it produces confidently wrong answers. The sequence never changes — diagnose, connect, make reliable, then augment.
Level 1 – 2
Level 4
Striking demonstrations, impossible to reproduce inside a corporate environment where every access is siloed. Kept: nothing, beyond an understanding of the underlying architectures.
A clear, documented failure: more time spent fixing what the AI produced than doing the work. Abandoned.
The turning point. AI produces the component, the mock-up, the data quality report — not a formula to copy. Measured on one engagement: one day for work estimated at a week.
Dashboard mock-ups, data health reports written in plain language and ranked by priority, document summarisation. Always reviewed by a human before it reaches a client.
It must be written precisely enough to cover exactly what is required. A vague prompt produces a vague deliverable — and costs more to correct than to redo.
The calculation remains a black box: nobody knows its inner workings. Anything touching a number is therefore reconciled against the source before it is presented.